61. Animal Ethics: October 2004
concerned. That means many animals will be shot in non-vital parts of their bodies. Some of the wounded animals will no doubt escape into the woods where they will die slow lingering deaths. Some of the other wounded animals, those too severely
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004_10_01_archive.html - 144.4kb
62. Animal Ethics: Are Animals Sentient?
It is not the case that [(a) animals are sentient, (b) animals are innocent, and (c) animals lack immortal souls] (from 3 and 4, modus tollens).Therefore,6. Either (a) animals are not sentient, (b) animals are not innocent, or (c) animals have
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2008/04/st-augustine-of-hippo-354-430-on-animal.html - 87.3kb
63. Animal Ethics: May 2009
human beings and other animals, there are no moral differences that justify human beings’ killing and eating animals but not killing and eating one another. Moreover, since it is morally wrong to kill and eat human beings, it is morally
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2009_05_01_archive.html - 113.4kb
64. Animal Ethics: August 2005
the training of performing animals, of the trapping of animals for fur, of the making of foie gras, if enforced by law would cause only slight changes in what is at its best mainly caprice, the fashions of amusement or clothing or food.
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2005_08_01_archive.html - 129.2kb
65. Animal Ethics: Confusions and Fallacies About Animals, Part 15
the Moral Status of Nonhuman Animals
19 July 2004
Confusions and Fallacies About Animals, Part 15
I’m always stunned to hear intelligent people defend meat-eating
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004/07/confusions-and-fallacies-about-animals_19.html - 90.5kb
66. Animal Ethics: Confusions and Fallacies About Animals, Part 16
and Fallacies About Animals, Part 16
Several readers have asked me in recent weeks whether there is anything morally objectionable about raising Animals humanely and then killing them painlessly. If the Animals are raised humanely
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004/07/confusions-and-fallacies-about-animals_26.html - 90.5kb
67. Animal Ethics: Issues to Discuss
a moral question, since no animals need be killed in the process of acquiring them?• Is there a morally relevant difference between eating wild animals and eating domesticated animals? After all, wild animals are not confined. If they're
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2003/11/issues-to-discuss.html - 93.5kb
68. Animal Ethics: July 2005
for the Interaction of Animals and Society
Center on Animal Liberation Affairs, The
Compassionate Cooks
Conservative Veggie
Culture and Animals Foundation
Elephant Sanctuary, The
Empty Cages
Equine Advocates
Essays in
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2005_07_01_archive.html - 123.0kb
69. Animal Ethics: Resolve to Do Right by Animals in 2007!
Resolving to do right by animals and to stop supporting unnecessary animal cruelty is yet another powerful example of ethical synergy at work. As we have just seen, resolving to do right by animals is a great way to do right by yourself . By
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2006/12/resolve-to-do-right-by-animals-in-2007.html - 101.6kb
70. Animal Ethics: Confusions and Fallacies About Animals, Part 8
charge that all companion animals are slaves, perhaps the person making it has in mind other animals besides dogs and cats. Wild animals such as lizards, snakes, monkeys, rodents (hamsters, gerbils, guinea pigs), and birds did not evolve with
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004/06/confusions-and-fallacies-about-animals.html - 91.4kb
Information Centre of