31. Animal Ethics: An Interview with Darian M. Ibrahim, B.S., J.D.
and meat from free-range animals? Peter Singer argues that there is. Our first goal, he says, should be to end factory farming, since that is where most of the suffering occurs. Many people who do not object to the use of animals as
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2006/02/interview-with-darian-m.html - 101.1kb
32. Animal Ethics
a moral question, since no animals need be killed in the process of acquiring them?• Is there a morally relevant difference between eating wild animals and eating domesticated animals? After all, wild animals are not confined. If they're
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2003-12-01T18%3A06%3A00-06%3A00 - 117.3kb
33. Animal Ethics: November 2003
a moral question, since no animals need be killed in the process of acquiring them?• Is there a morally relevant difference between eating wild animals and eating domesticated animals? After all, wild animals are not confined. If they're
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2003_11_01_archive.html - 117.1kb
34. Animal Ethics: February 2009
have their shed legs eaten, animals whose psychological health and well-being depended on such eating. Would these animals also be exploited? If so, would this be immoral? To be sure, we would be using the animals and in this sense would be
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2009_02_01_archive.html - 135.7kb
35. Animal Ethics: November 2004
are not sure they are animals. They would like to feel they might be something better than animals. That’s understandable: other animals might feel they are something different than “just animals” too. But we must
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004_11_01_archive.html - 184.1kb
36. Animal Ethics: August 2007
in their concern for animals. Indeed, if public sympathy is changing in China regarding how we treat animals raised and killed for food, as it is here in the United States, then we can only expect future improvements in the welfare of farm
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2007_08_01_archive.html - 174.2kb
37. Animal Ethics: January 2005
of animal rights.” Animals matter. Morally. They have intrinsic moral significance, just like human beings (but unlike plants). Immanuel Kant famously denied that Animals have intrinsic moral significance. If it’s wrong to
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2005_01_01_archive.html - 204.4kb
38. Animal Ethics
in their responses to animals and nature. They are also most prone to be uncaring or fearful of the natural world and of all but a few familiar animals. Between six and nine, children become interested in wild creatures for the first time,
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2004-02-01T21%3A40%3A00-06%3A00 - 180.0kb
39. Animal Ethics: September 2009
that rearing and killing animals for food is morally offensive. He might argue that eating animals is morally bad because of the pain inflicted on animals in rearing and killing them to be eaten. Or he could object to the killing itself. These
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2009_09_01_archive.html - 148.6kb
40. Animal Ethics: December 2009
added to the feed of healthy animals to promote rapid weight gain.
The FDA, the CDC, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture have all declared drug-resistant diseases stemming from antibiotic use in animals a "serious emerging concern."
The
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2009_12_01_archive.html - 133.6kb
Information Centre of