11. Animal Ethics: January 2008
to our moral relationship to animals. For example, Carl Cohen, who has argued at length that animals don’t have rights, admits: If animals feel pain (and certainly mammals do, . . .), we humans surely ought cause no pain to them that cannot
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2008_01_01_archive.html - 249.6kb
12. Animal Ethics: January 2004
in their responses to animals and nature. They are also most prone to be uncaring or fearful of the natural world and of all but a few familiar animals. Between six and nine, children become interested in wild creatures for the first time,
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004_01_01_archive.html - 280.9kb
13. Animal Ethics: February 2006
and meat from free-range animals? Peter Singer argues that there is. Our first goal, he says, should be to end factory farming, since that is where most of the suffering occurs. Many people who do not object to the use of animals as
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2006_02_01_archive.html - 173.4kb
14. Animal Ethics
our responsibilities are the animals themselves. But how does this differ from saying that the animals have rights? If our responsibilities are to refrain from harming animals, then they have negative rights against us. If our responsibilities
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2005-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-06%3A00&updated-max=2006-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-06%3A00&max-results=50 - 314.2kb
15. Animal Ethics: February 2004
Wise, Steven M. "Of Farm Animals and Justice." Pace Environmental Law Review 3 (1986): 191-227.Wise, Steven M. "How Nonhuman Animals Were Trapped in a Nonexistent Universe." Animal Law 1 (1995): 15-45.Wise, Steven M. "The Legal
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004_02_01_archive.html - 243.0kb
16. Animal Ethics: May 2008
What they believe is that animals matter, morally. animals have weight on the moral scale. Morally speaking, animals are something, not nothing. Inflicting pain on animals must be justified. This is not to say that it can't be justified, only
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2008_05_01_archive.html - 197.5kb
17. Animal Ethics: March 2007
H. Franklin on the Use of Animals in Research
To inflict death or pain on Animals for scientific or medical research is wrong morally, and ought to be prohibited. This follows from everything said in the text about the rights of
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2007_03_01_archive.html - 201.5kb
18. Animal Ethics: August 2008
perpetrated. Compassion for animals cannot be achieved by violence. Respect for animals cannot be coerced by threats. And justice for animals will never be achieved through criminal acts.It is our job as advocates for animals to promote the
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2008_08_01_archive.html - 167.8kb
19. Animal Ethics: December 2004
on the Moral Status of Animals
If some Animals count for something, which Animals count, how much do they count, and how can this be determined? Suppose (as I believe the evidence supports) that eating Animals is not necessary for
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004_12_01_archive.html - 206.0kb
20. Animal Ethics
a moral question, since no animals need be killed in the process of acquiring them?• Is there a morally relevant difference between eating wild animals and eating domesticated animals? After all, wild animals are not confined. If they're
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2003-12-04T19%3A01%3A00-06%3A00&max-results=50 - 143.4kb
Information Centre of