41. Animal Ethics
the zoo is never fun for the animals.
By putting animals in zoos, you eliminate all that is natural to them; the zoo is where they live according to humans’ feeding and breeding regimens. Captivity in zoos causes the animals to go mad,
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2011-06-01T10%3A49%3A00-05%3A00 - 173.3kb
42. Animal Ethics
with a love and reverence of animals. Cruelty and disregard for them are taught. In this country, this lesson is usually less direct: that it is somehow logical to teach kids to love and respect animals while feeding them animals that have been
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2007-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-06%3A00&updated-max=2008-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-06%3A00&max-results=50 - 315.1kb
43. Animal Ethics
the zoo is never fun for the animals.
By putting animals in zoos, you eliminate all that is natural to them; the zoo is where they live according to humans’ feeding and breeding regimens. Captivity in zoos causes the animals to go mad,
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2011-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-06%3A00&updated-max=2012-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-06%3A00&max-results=20 - 173.7kb
44. Animal Ethics: Categorizing Animals
differences—among animals. Let me explain.Take the class of animals. Divide it into two mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive classes: humans and nonhumans. You and I, like Lassie and Mr Ed, are animals. You and I, however, are
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2003/12/categorizing-animals.html - 94.5kb
45. Animal Ethics: September 2004
only three answers: 1. The animals you kill don’t feel pain (whereas humans do).2. The animals you kill don’t feel as much pain as humans do.3. The pain of the animals you kill doesn’t count, morally speaking (whereas that of
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004_09_01_archive.html - 214.4kb
46. Animal Ethics: June 2009
that the actual treatment of animals used for food is immoral, that animals are made to suffer needlessly. The question that must be raised, however, is how the conclusion not to eat meat follows from this. One argument is this: The present
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2009_06_01_archive.html - 122.1kb
47. Animal Ethics: November 2008
between (nonhuman) animals and plants. Cell 1 (the northwest quadrant of the diagram) contains wild animals; cell 2 (the northeast quadrant) contains wild plants; cell 3 (the southwest quadrant) contains domesticated animals (e.g., dogs,
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2008_11_01_archive.html - 147.6kb
48. Animal Ethics: August 2009
feel yourself to be to other animals. Would they have the right to treat you as you treat animals you breed, keep, and kill for food? The implication is certainly that it would be inconsistent for us to think that it is morally permissible for us
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2009_08_01_archive.html - 139.8kb
49. Animal Ethics: April 2005
the Moral Status of Nonhuman Animals
25 April 2005
The Pope on Animals
Here is PETA's letter to Pope Benedict XVI. If you're Catholic, please read what the pope has
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2005_04_01_archive.html - 129.8kb
50. Animal Ethics: December 2008
Note from KBJ: I thought of animals when I read this. Many people exclude animals from moral consideration, even though they would never think to neglect, much less harm, a dog or a cat. It is natural to feel sympathy for animals who are
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2008_12_01_archive.html - 125.5kb
Information Centre of