Information Centre of General Animal Protection (beta)

51. Animal Ethics: Meat, Cancer, and the Cumulative Case for Ethical Vegetarianism

to our moral relationship to animals. For example, Carl Cohen, who has argued at length that animals don’t have rights, admits: If animals feel pain (and certainly mammals do, . . .), we humans surely ought cause no pain to them that cannot

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2008/01/meat-cancer-and-cumulative-case-for.html - 99.9kb

52. Animal Ethics: Confusions and Fallacies About Animals, Part 6

the Moral Status of Nonhuman Animals 18 May 2004 Confusions and Fallacies About Animals, Part 6 Anyone who has been reading this blog for more than a few days knows that

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004/05/confusions-and-fallacies-about-animals_18.html - 93.2kb

53. Animal Ethics: February 2007

some of Dr Webb's essays on animals and vegetarianism. I continue to be astounded by the assumption that concern for animals is a secular, progressive cause. There are many atheists and progressives who don't care a whit about animals. There

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2007_02_01_archive.html - 137.4kb

54. Animal Ethics: July 2007

that a duty of men to animals involves a right of men against animals, and (1) implies that this involves a duty of animals to men, and therefore (4) and (1) together imply that a duty of men to animals involves a duty of animals to men. And

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2007_07_01_archive.html - 185.9kb

55. Animal Ethics: Confusions and Fallacies About Animals, Part 2

and Fallacies About Animals, Part 3 Cruelty Ambrose Bierce Veal RenÃ© Descartes (1596-1650) on Animal Minds A Friend of Animals Vegemite Fighting the Facts Old Font Engineering Animals Repartee Confusions

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004/04/confusions-and-fallacies-about-animals_19.html - 92.1kb

56. Animal Ethics: Confusions and Fallacies About Animals, Part 3

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004/04/confusions-and-fallacies-about-animals.html - 92.9kb

57. Animal Ethics: June 2006

for humans to kill and eat animals. There’s a morally relevant difference between the cases, namely, that humans are moral agents and animals are not. Humans are responsible for their conduct; animals are not. Humans can control their

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2006_06_01_archive.html - 138.5kb

58. Animal Ethics: Moral Vegetarianism, Part 9 of 13

have autonomy rights. If no animals are moral agents, as seems plausible, then no animals have autonomy rights. But this says nothing about whether animals have welfare rights. Since (most) animals are sentient, (most) animals have at least one

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2009/07/moral-vegetarianism-part-9-of-13_07.html - 89.9kb

59. Animal Ethics: Make This the Year You Do Right by Animals

Resolving to do right by animals and to stop supporting unnecessary animal cruelty is yet another powerful example of ethical synergy at work. As we have just seen, resolving to do right by animals is a great way to do right by oneself. By not

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2008/01/make-this-year-you-do-right-by-animals.html - 101.1kb

60. Animal Ethics: June 2005

for the Interaction of Animals and Society Center on Animal Liberation Affairs, The Compassionate Cooks Conservative Veggie Culture and Animals Foundation Elephant Sanctuary, The Empty Cages Equine Advocates Essays in

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2005_06_01_archive.html - 115.2kb