Information Centre of General Animal Protection (beta)

31. Animal Ethics: January 2007

for the Ethical Treatment of Animals? As many of you know, I despise PETA. It does a great deal of harm to Animals. See here for one example. With friends like PETA, Animals don't need enemies. Posted by Keith Burgess-Jackson

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2007_01_01_archive.html - 248.2kb

32. Animal Ethics: An Interview with Darian M. Ibrahim, B.S., J.D.

and meat from free-range animals? Peter Singer argues that there is. Our first goal, he says, should be to end factory farming, since that is where most of the suffering occurs. Many people who do not object to the use of animals as

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2006/02/interview-with-darian-m.html - 101.1kb

33. Animal Ethics

a moral question, since no animals need be killed in the process of acquiring them?• Is there a morally relevant difference between eating wild animals and eating domesticated animals? After all, wild animals are not confined. If they're

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2003-12-01T18%3A06%3A00-06%3A00 - 117.3kb

34. Animal Ethics: November 2009

of view of doing better by animals. Jean Kazez Dallas, Nov. 22, 2009 The writer teaches philosophy at Southern Methodist University and is the author of the forthcoming “Animalkind: What We Owe to animals .” To the Editor: Soon

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2009_11_01_archive.html - 157.3kb

35. Animal Ethics: February 2009

the real world, in which no animals (other than humans) can consent? This, with all due respect to Martin, is philosophy run amok. Still, one might argue that eating such animals is wrong because it is necessary to kill them in order to eat

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2009_02_01_archive.html - 135.7kb

36. Animal Ethics: January 2005

of animal rights.” Animals matter. Morally. They have intrinsic moral significance, just like human beings (but unlike plants). Immanuel Kant famously denied that Animals have intrinsic moral significance. If it’s wrong to

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2005_01_01_archive.html - 204.4kb

37. Animal Ethics: August 2007

in their concern for animals. Indeed, if public sympathy is changing in China regarding how we treat animals raised and killed for food, as it is here in the United States, then we can only expect future improvements in the welfare of farm

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2007_08_01_archive.html - 174.2kb

38. Animal Ethics: November 2003

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2003_11_01_archive.html - 117.1kb

39. Animal Ethics

in their responses to animals and nature. They are also most prone to be uncaring or fearful of the natural world and of all but a few familiar animals. Between six and nine, children become interested in wild creatures for the first time,

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2004-02-01T21%3A40%3A00-06%3A00 - 180.0kb

40. Animal Ethics: September 2009

that rearing and killing animals for food is morally offensive. He might argue that eating animals is morally bad because of the pain inflicted on animals in rearing and killing them to be eaten. Or he could object to the killing itself. These

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2009_09_01_archive.html - 148.6kb