11. National Anti-Vivisection Society: Pew Research Center and AAAS Release Poll...
that if we are to end vivisection, we must also advance our argument that animals are not predictive for human response to drugs and disease. NAVS will continue to invest in our educational programs that present a credible and compelling
http://www.navs.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=7919&security=1&news_iv_ctrl=1201 - 57.4kb
12. National Anti-Vivisection Society: Pew Research Center and AAAS Release Poll...
that if we are to end vivisection, we must also advance our argument that animals are not predictive for human response to drugs and disease. NAVS will continue to invest in our educational programs that present a credible and compelling
http://www.navs.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=7919 - 57.3kb
13. National Anti-Vivisection Society:
Efforts
WHAT IS VIVISECTION? - VIVISECTION is the practice of cutting into or using invasive techniques on live animals or dissecting the bodies of animals. Anti-VIVISECTIONists are people who oppose these practices for ethical and
http://www.navs.org/site/PageServer?pagename=about_main - 22.4kb
14. National Anti-Vivisection Society:
York: Bill Prohibits Vivisection in Higher Education
Bill Details
Name: Prohibition against Vivisection in Higher Education Number: AB 7458 Call for Action: Contact your State Assemblyperson and ask him/her to
http://www.navs.org/site/Advocacy?pagename=homepage&id=431 - 22.8kb
15. National Anti-Vivisection Society: More Evidence Three Rs Do Not Work
is ethical outrage over vivisection among many if not most of the population.
If the number of animals used in vivisection is increasing in the UK, then that alone should give one pause when considering whether the Three Rs can ever be
http://www.navs.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=7934 - 19.3kb
16. National Anti-Vivisection Society: Mexicans, Srokes and FRAME
harmful to someone else.
Vivisection is sold to society on the grounds that it makes our medications safer and predicts response and mechanisms of human diseases. Neither of these things is true. Animals cannot predict drug efficacy or toxicity
http://www.navs.org/site/News2?news_iv_ctrl=-1&page=NewsArticle&id=7823 - 23.9kb
17. National Anti-Vivisection Society:
of relevance to the vivisection debate. The pro-vivisection community uses the concepts of (a) animal experimentation and (b) harvesting animal parts for use in humans interchangeably. However, these activities are not the same and do
http://www.navs.org/site/PageServer?pagename=ain_sci_medicalresearch_diabetes - 39.4kb
18. National Anti-Vivisection Society:
Animal Research
Anti-vivisectionists use a two-pronged argument to substantiate their case against animal experimentation. They oppose animal experimentation on both ethical and scientific grounds. Both perspectives of this argument provide
http://www.navs.org/site/PageServer?pagename=ain_sci_defend - 27.4kb
19. National Anti-Vivisection Society:
with a vested interest in vivisection violate them.)
How can we use science and critical thought when we think of issues like animals in science?
Michael Shermer, the founding publisher of Skeptic magazine (http://www.skeptic.com/ ) and the
http://www.navs.org/site/PageServer?pagename=ain_sci_research_main_critical_thought - 33.5kb
20. National Anti-Vivisection Society:
issued. Without facts, vivisection does not make sense. Pick at the edges of the pro-vivisection argument and you find researchers opting for what is expedient in the short term (grant money and papers) in lieu of what actually works in the
http://www.navs.org/site/PageServer?pagename=ain_sci_medicalresearch_childhood - 23.4kb
Information Centre of