1. Animal Ethics
to the functions of animals; or of those parts of the nature of man which he shares with the inferior animals. (Thus opposed to intellectual and spiritual ). 4. a. Carnal, fleshly, as opposed to moral, spiritual. b. Characteristic
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2004-02-09T10%3A04%3A00-06%3A00&max-results=50&reverse-paginate=true - 334.7kb
2. Animal Ethics: May 2004
1. Those who treat animals respectfully no matter what PETA does.2. Those who treat animals disrespectfully no matter what PETA does.3. Those who treat animals respectfully as a result of what PETA does.4. Those who treat animals
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004_05_01_archive.html - 284.1kb
3. Animal Ethics: January 2004
to the functions of animals; or of those parts of the nature of man which he shares with the inferior animals. (Thus opposed to intellectual and spiritual ). 4. a. Carnal, fleshly, as opposed to moral, spiritual. b. Characteristic
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004_01_01_archive.html - 280.9kb
4. Animal Ethics: March 2004
Feinberg on the Rights of Animals
Now, if a person agrees with the conclusion of the argument thus far, that Animals are the sorts of beings that can have rights, and further, if he accepts the moral judgment that we ought to be kind
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004_03_01_archive.html - 249.3kb