1. Animal Ethics: April 2004
contributes to the amount of pain and suffering in the world.Do you care about pain and suffering? I assume you care about your own pain and suffering. You probably also care about the pain and suffering of your loved ones. But why are pain
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004_04_01_archive.html - 301.6kb
2. Animal Ethics: January 2008
in causing an animal pain if and only if we have a good reason for doing so. If there is no good reason to cause an animal pain, then causing that animal pain cannot be justified.] Elsewhere, Cohen reiterates his commitment to (1) and (2):
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2008_01_01_archive.html - 249.6kb
3. Animal Ethics
sure that plants don't feel pain. Let me repeat something I've said many times: There is no reason whatsoever to think that plants feel pain (or anything else). They lack brains and nerves. They're rooted in the earth, so a pain response would
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2004-02-09T10%3A04%3A00-06%3A00&max-results=50&reverse-paginate=true - 334.7kb
4. Animal Ethics: Moral Vegetarianism
only animals who can feel pain are not to be eaten. Since it is unlikely that microorganisms can feel pain, the vegetarian can eat them without scruples. But this suggestion has a peculiar implication. If beef cattle who could not feel pain were
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/search/label/Moral%20Vegetarianism - 215.1kb
5. Animal Ethics: January 2004
habits of animals; animal painter, a painter of animals as opposed to landscapes, portraits, or incidents of human action; so animal painting and animal piece; animal plant, a zoophyte or polype, as coral; animal pole Embryology
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004_01_01_archive.html - 280.9kb
6. Animal Ethics: February 2009
only animals who can feel pain are not to be eaten. Since it is unlikely that microorganisms can feel pain, the vegetarian can eat them without scruples. But this suggestion has a peculiar implication. If beef cattle who could not feel pain were
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2009_02_01_archive.html - 135.7kb
7. Animal Ethics: Meat, Cancer, and the Cumulative Case for Ethical Vegetarianism
in causing an animal pain if and only if we have a good reason for doing so. If there is no good reason to cause an animal pain, then causing that animal pain cannot be justified.] Elsewhere, Cohen reiterates his commitment to (1) and (2):
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2008/01/meat-cancer-and-cumulative-case-for.html - 99.9kb
8. Animal Ethics: September 2004
of why, in his view, animal pain doesn’t count. How does saying that animal pain doesn’t count differ from saying that African-American pain doesn’t count or that Iraqi pain doesn’t count or that female pain doesn’t
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004_09_01_archive.html - 214.4kb
9. Animal Ethics: Do Fish Feel Pain?
to say that fish feel pain is simply not something that is strongly supported by science. This year's study by the Roslin Institute and the University of Edinburgh is the first I know of to even suggest that fish may feel pain. Yet this
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004/01/do-fish-feel-pain.html - 88.6kb
10. Animal Ethics
creatures feel; they know pain. They suffer pain just as we humans suffer pain. Egg-laying hens are confined to battery cages. Unable to spread their wings, they are reduced to nothing more than an egg-laying machine.Last April, the
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2006-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-06%3A00&updated-max=2007-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-06%3A00&max-results=50 - 345.0kb
Information Centre of