11. Animal Ethics: An Interview with Darian M. Ibrahim, B.S., J.D.
arguing for or focusing on vegetarianism, let alone veganism, despite the fact that food accounts for 98% of our domestic animal use. The fallback position is often something to the effect of "eating animals is okay if they are treated
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2006/02/interview-with-darian-m.html - 101.1kb
12. Animal Ethics: June 2006
you oppose cruelty, try vegetarianism.Bruce G. FriedrichNorfolk, Va., June 25, 2006The writer is vice president for international grass-roots campaigns, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.To the Editor:If we lived in the land of the
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2006_06_01_archive.html - 138.5kb
13. Animal Ethics: May 2004
converts and perverts, by definition, have been affected (influenced) by PETA’s actions, but in different ways. Converts are those who, but for PETA, would continue to eat meat, wear leather, &c. Perverts are those who, but for PETA,
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004_05_01_archive.html - 284.1kb
14. Animal Ethics
what you have written about vegetarianism........ but i don't think i will change. irrational, perhaps. but - i feel better eating some meat protein
Posted by
Keith Burgess-Jackson
at
2:06 PM
0
comments
Email
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2004-02-01T21%3A40%3A00-06%3A00 - 180.0kb
15. Animal Ethics: From Today's New York Times
necessary, animal use is by definition inhumane—unkind where we could as a society choose kind. It is inhumane to humans as well, E. coli or not, since animal protein and animal fat in the diet significantly increase chronic-disease risk,
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2009/06/from-todays-new-york-times_28.html - 84.3kb
16. Animal Ethics: From Today's New York Times
you oppose cruelty, try vegetarianism.Bruce G. FriedrichNorfolk, Va., June 25, 2006The writer is vice president for international grass-roots campaigns, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.To the Editor:If we lived in the land of the
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2006/06/from-todays-new-york-times-to-editor_28.html - 89.0kb
17. Animal Ethics: Thinking Philosophically About PETA
converts and perverts, by definition, have been affected (influenced) by PETA’s actions, but in different ways. Converts are those who, but for PETA, would continue to eat meat, wear leather, &c. Perverts are those who, but for PETA,
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004/05/thinking-philosophically-about-peta.html - 91.6kb
18. Animal Ethics: The True Costs of the Rhetoric of Terror Continue to Mount &#...
it now expands the the definition of ‘animal enterprise terrorism’ to include acts that result in neither fear nor economic damages nor bodily injury. What is even more disturbing is that the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2006/12/true-costs-of-rhetoric-of-terror.html - 95.5kb
Information Centre of