Information Centre of General Animal Protection (beta)

1. Animal Ethics: July 2004

Don't other animals eat other animals? Aren't there more animals being consumed by non-human animals (including bugs, fish, etc; a non-human is a non-human) than by humans? Don't they do it as a function of biology and evolution?

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004_07_01_archive.html - 295.8kb

2. Animal Ethics

the flesh of humanely raised animals who were painlessly killed (as we have been assuming ), the permissibility of eating such animals does not entail the permissibility of eating inhumanely raised animals. Over 95% of all animals raised for food

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2006-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-06%3A00&updated-max=2007-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-06%3A00&max-results=50 - 345.0kb

3. Animal Ethics: December 2006

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2006_12_01_archive.html - 287.5kb

4. Animal Ethics: Moral Vegetarianism

have autonomy rights. If no animals are moral agents, as seems plausible, then no animals have autonomy rights. But this says nothing about whether animals have welfare rights. Since (most) animals are sentient, (most) animals have at least one

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/search/label/Moral%20Vegetarianism - 215.1kb

5. Animal Ethics

that we have duties towards animals he must take one or other of two lines. He can say that animals are persons. Or he can say that there are moral limitations on our treatment of animals because certain kinds of treatment of animals can involve

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2008-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-06%3A00&updated-max=2009-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-06%3A00&max-results=50 - 329.1kb

6. Animal Ethics

person who thinks nonhuman animals have moral status. But even if he were the only person who thinks this, nothing would follow about the moral status of animals. Don't confuse the question whether animals matter morally with the question

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2004-02-09T10%3A04%3A00-06%3A00&max-results=50&reverse-paginate=true - 334.7kb

7. Animal Ethics: May 2004

1. Those who treat animals respectfully no matter what PETA does.2. Those who treat animals disrespectfully no matter what PETA does.3. Those who treat animals respectfully as a result of what PETA does.4. Those who treat animals

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004_05_01_archive.html - 284.1kb

8. Animal Ethics

on the Moral Status of Animals If some Animals count for something, which Animals count, how much do they count, and how can this be determined? Suppose (as I believe the evidence supports) that eating Animals is not necessary for

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2004-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-06%3A00&updated-max=2005-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-06%3A00&max-results=50 - 339.6kb

9. Animal Ethics: June 2004

domestic pets but little for animals with less emotional appeal to us. In philosophy departments all over the English-speaking world, the moral status of animals has become a lively topic of debate, and the number of those calling for a change in

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004_06_01_archive.html - 279.9kb

10. Animal Ethics: April 2004

and Fallacies About Animals, Part 3 Cruelty Ambrose Bierce Veal RenÃ© Descartes (1596-1650) on Animal Minds A Friend of Animals Vegemite Fighting the Facts Old Font Engineering Animals Repartee Confusions

http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2004_04_01_archive.html - 301.6kb