121. Animal Ethics
Aug. 5 editorial "The Duplicate Dog " should be cause for concern, not celebration.Genetic duplicates may turn out far different than their forebears. More to the point, with millions of healthy and adoptable cats and dogs being killed each year
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2005-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-06%3A00&updated-max=2006-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-06%3A00&max-results=50 - 314.2kb
122. Animal Ethics
owner who trains his dog on cats, first removing the cat's claws to protect his dog from injury, or of the householder who half-starves his dog so that he can have an extra beer or two, or of the person who hunts kangaroos, wounding many and
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2010-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-06%3A00&updated-max=2011-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-06%3A00&max-results=48 - 308.3kb
123. Animal Ethics: Search results for bullfighting
teach, and where we were educated. Why should we not know who you are?
Posted by
Keith Burgess-Jackson
at
6:27 PM
Email This
BlogThis!
Share to Twitter
Share to Facebook
Share to Google Buzz
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/search?q=bullfighting - 89.1kb
124. Animal Ethics
like birds and dogs & cats DO have feelings & intelligence, etc. but - i still eat beef & pork & chicken.i've read what you have written about vegetarianism........ but i don't think i will change. irrational, perhaps. but - i feel
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2004-02-01T21%3A40%3A00-06%3A00 - 180.0kb
125. Animal Ethics: September 2009
It is argued that beef cattle and hogs are protein factories in reserve. In order to produce one pound of beef, cattle eat approximately sixteen pounds of grain; and in order to produce six pounds of pork or ham, hogs eat approximately six
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2009_09_01_archive.html - 148.6kb
126. Animal Ethics: August 2009
I have been concerned to advocate a normative utilitarian theory from the point of view of a non-cognitivist meta-ethics. I assumed that Hume was right in thinking that ultimately morality depends on how we feel about things. In advocating
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2009_08_01_archive.html - 139.8kb
127. Animal Ethics: May 2009
of land to the grazing of cattle, and the consequent starving of agriculture, is far too costly to be justified, in the face of an extending civilisation, unless by a much clearer proof of its necessity than any which its advocates have essayed;
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2009_05_01_archive.html - 113.4kb
128. Animal Ethics: June 2009
in methane emissions from cattle isn’t going to be anywhere near enough to turn dairying or beef production into sustainable industries. Reducing the size of the national cattle herd is the only feasible solution.Peter SingerGeoff
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2009_06_01_archive.html - 122.1kb
129. Animal Ethics: July 2009
I say this not because I advocate such a thing, but to call the view into question. Any view or theory that has an unacceptable implication is unacceptable. Some vegetarians have argued that it is impossible for one to maintain without absurdity
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2009_07_01_archive.html - 136.3kb
130. Animal Ethics: February 2009
has a peculiar implication. If beef cattle who could not feel pain were developed, then it would be permissible to eat them. The ability to feel pain is not an obviously plausible way of morally distinguishing microorganisms from other
http://animalethics.blogspot.com/2009_02_01_archive.html - 135.7kb
Information Centre of