1. Animal Liberation at 30, by Peter Singer
to killing
animals, we inflict suffering on them, in a wide variety of ways.
So the defenders of common practices involving animals owe us an
explanation for their willingness to make animals suffer
http://www.animal-rights-library.com/texts-m/singer04.htm - 57.4kb
2. The Post-Darwinian Transition, by David Pearce
Ethics and
Animals : Oxford, Clarendon 1990); and, rather incongruously,
philosopher Peter Carruthers' The Animals Issue . Carruthers
advances the thesis that the mental states of Animals are all
http://www.animal-rights-library.com/texts-m/pearce01.htm - 186.5kb
3. Ethics and the New Animal Liberation Movement, by Peter Singer
on
non-human animals would cause less suffering overall, for the
non-human animals would not have the same anticipatory dread. This
does not mean, I hasten to add, that it is all right to experiment
http://www.animal-rights-library.com/texts-m/singer01.htm - 32.2kb
4. A Report to the Academy, by John Gray
difference between using animals for scientific research and using humans: humans have the capacity for consent, whereas animals do not. It is true that adult humans can express their wishes to other humans in ways that even our closest animal
http://www.animal-rights-library.com/texts-m/gray01.htm - 15.5kb
5. The Case for Animal Rights, by Tom Regan
however,
some animals are the objects of the sentimental interest of
others. You, for example, love your dog or cat. So those animals
that enough people care about (companion animals, whales, baby
http://www.animal-rights-library.com/texts-m/regan03.htm - 45.8kb
6. Apes and the Idea of Kindred, by Stephen R. L. Clark
by respect for rational autonomy, since not all human beings are
thus rational. If UNESCO wished to oppose the Nazi project (as of
course it did) it could hardly do so by endorsing the Nazi
http://www.animal-rights-library.com/texts-m/clark01.htm - 62.1kb
Information Centre of