1. National Anti-Vivisection Society: Little Pet-Shop Of Horrors
that cut costs by housing animals in overcrowded and overwhelmingly despicable confinements. These animals are provided with little or no room to move about and scarce food and water, in order to keep more animals for sale at a lesser cost.
http://www.navs.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=8613&security=1&news_iv_ctrl=1201 - 36.3kb
2. National Anti-Vivisection Society: Little Pet-Shop Of Horrors
that cut costs by housing animals in overcrowded and overwhelmingly despicable confinements. These animals are provided with little or no room to move about and scarce food and water, in order to keep more animals for sale at a lesser cost.
http://www.navs.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=8613 - 36.2kb
3. Mouse pain study stirs debate : Nature News
who offer an opinion about animal research from the comfort and safety of good health, they fail to understand what true suffering is. Pain is a sensation that we share with animals, but animals are mercifully spared the kind of psychological
http://www.navs.org/site/R?i=bUY4LP9t_clXSOL-q9hK4Q.. - 52.4kb
4. National Anti-Vivisection Society:
Animals in Scientific Research
Why Scientists Defend Animal Research
Anti-vivisectionists use a two-pronged argument to substantiate their case against Animal experimentation. They oppose Animal experimentation on
http://www.navs.org/site/PageServer?pagename=ain_sci_defend - 27.4kb
5. National Anti-Vivisection Society: European Initiative Including 18 Companie...
development in the world of animal testing and animal-based research.
For as long as animals have been used in research, the public has been uncomfortable with their use. The suffering has been obvious but society accepted it as a necessary
http://www.navs.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=7396&news_iv_ctrl=1081 - 22.3kb
6. National Anti-Vivisection Society:
be extended to all animals used in research, once the animal Welfare Act is again amended to include them. While NAVS opposes the use of animals for research, until non-animal methodologies replace those animals in the laboratory, the
http://www.navs.org/site/PageServer?pagename=leg_LegalArena_regcamp_USDA_AWA - 23.0kb
7. A Conversation With Jane Goodall - 50 Years of Chimpanzees - NYTimes.com
an invasive procedure on an animal that is capable of suffering and feeling pain, your behavior is amoral.
These particular animals have been “retired” from experimentation for the
http://www.navs.org/site/R?i=MdeuZOgByrDy7NT24EtkGQ.. - 57.6kb
8. National Anti-Vivisection Society:
for the use of once-live animals in classroom dissection exercises.
Additional Resources:
Arluke, A. and Lockwood, R. (Eds.). Society and animals , Special Theme Issue: animal Cruelty, Volume 5, Number 3, 1997, Psychologists for the
http://www.navs.org/site/PageServer?pagename=ain_edu_link_violence_cruelty - 22.3kb
9. National Anti-Vivisection Society:
All other research on animals must be conducted in a regulated research institution.One more change that deserves at least a passing note: If an animal is euthanized solely for a student’s project, the study must be considered a
http://www.navs.org/site/PageServer?pagename=ain_edu_science_fair_intelcampaign - 27.6kb
10. National Anti-Vivisection Society: Mexicans, Srokes and FRAME
or at least similar animals in toxicity testing is equally fallacious. His reasoning goes something like this:
P1. animal testing in toxicity currently is not predictive because of genetic dissimilarities among the test animals.P2. If
http://www.navs.org/site/News2?news_iv_ctrl=-1&page=NewsArticle&id=7823 - 23.9kb
Information Centre of